View cases by country
Argentina
Argentina
Argentina
Argentina
Peru
Peru
Peru
Peru
Peru
Peru
Democratic Republic of the Congo
Democratic Republic of the Congo
Democratic Republic of the Congo
Democratic Republic of the Congo
Indonesia
Ecuador
Ecuador
Somalia
Somalia
Somalia
Somalia
Somalia
Somalia
Somalia
Somalia
Colombia
Colombia
Colombia
Colombia
Colombia
Colombia
Ivory Coast
Ivory Coast
Central African Republic
Central African Republic
Central African Republic
Central African Republic
South Sudan
South Sudan
South Sudan
South Sudan
South Sudan
South Sudan
Sri Lanka
Sri Lanka
Sri Lanka
Sri Lanka
Sierra Leone
Sierra Leone
Nigeria
Nigeria
Burkina Faso
Burkina Faso
Sudan
Sudan
Sudan
Sudan
Sudan
Sudan
Sudan
Sudan
Philippines
Philippines
Philippines
Philippines
Philippines
Philippines
El Salvador
El Salvador
Chad
Chad
Chad
Chad
Ethiopia and Eritrea
Ethiopia and Eritrea
Thailand
Thailand
Yemen
Yemen
Niger
Niger
Niger
Niger
Mali
Mali
Mali
Mali
Mali
Mali
Mauritania
Mauritania
India
India
Libya
Libya
Libya
Libya
Libya
Libya
Libya
Libya
Libya
Libya
Libya
Libya
Libya
Libya
Libya
Libya
Nepal
Nepal
Nepal
Nepal
Nepal
Nepal
Nepal
Nepal
Kuwait
Kuwait
Kuwait
Kuwait
Jordan
Jordan
Iran
Iran
Iraq
Iraq
Iraq
Iraq
Iraq
Iraq
Iraq
Iraq
Iraq
Iraq
Iraq
Iraq
Iraq
Iraq
Iraq
Iraq
Iraq
Iraq
Iraq
Iraq
Iraq
Iraq
Syria
Syria
Afghanistan
Afghanistan
Afghanistan
Afghanistan
Cyprus
Cyprus
United States
United States
United States
United States
Türkiye
Türkiye
Türkiye
Türkiye
Armenia
Azerbaijan
Albania
Georgia
Georgia
Georgia
Georgia
Georgia
Georgia
Bosnia and Herzegovina
Bosnia and Herzegovina
Bosnia and Herzegovina
Bosnia and Herzegovina
Croatia
Croatia
Croatia
Croatia
Netherlands
Netherlands
United Kingdom
United Kingdom
United Kingdom
United Kingdom
United Kingdom
United Kingdom
Canada
Canada
VIEW CASES BY TOPIC
About the project
“IHL in action: Respect for the law on the battlefield” is a collection of real case-studies documenting compliance with international humanitarian law (IHL) in modern warfare. Based on publicly available information, these cases have been assessed by academics as demonstrating respect for IHL. From 2016 to 2020 the project has been conducted by four leadoff IHL clinics: Emory University School of Law, Leiden University, Interdisciplinary Center Herzliya and Roma Tre University.
The current active partnerships are with Leiden University and Roma Tray University. All cases have undergone independent peer review. The database is hosted by the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) with a view to encourage the reporting, collection and promotion of instances of respect for IHL. The cases shall not be construed as reflecting the views of the ICRC.
>> Read more...
Disclaimer
The aim of this database is solely to encourage practice-oriented thinking on compliance with international humanitarian law (IHL) and the elements that underpin it, by providing a selection of documents and resources on past and current practice in this domain. The opinions expressed in the cases included on this website are not to be taken as those of the ICRC or of the authors. No description of facts in any document reproduced on this website can be construed as the opinion of the ICRC or of the authors. Where cases illustrate examples of respect for IHL, under no circumstances must this be perceived as minimizing any violations that may have occurred in the same conflict situations. Neither can it be perceived as legitimizing the behaviour of any belligerents. Several cases demonstrate how behaviour changed over time and therefore also refer to the violations that precipitated the need for such change. Their inclusion is not to be taken as an endorsement of any past violations; they are reproduced merely to show how practice can evolve over time and that respect for and violations of IHL often occur in the same context. While utmost care has been taken to cross-reference sources to ensure their accuracy, it is often difficult to obtain undisputed confirmation of instances in which IHL has been observed correctly. This is largely because such instances are not as widely reported as those in which the law is violated. Similarly, some conflict situations generate more interest – from the media, NGOs, legal and academic circles, etc. – than others, and this is necessarily reflected in the distribution of cases included in the database. While it may seem unequal, rest assured that the authors did everything possible to ensure fair representation of contexts and conflict parties. In selecting cases, the authors also chose to reproduce documents that illustrate or discuss legal and non-legal elements that may contribute to respect for IHL. All reproduced documents are either the official English version, where one exists, or a version translated into English by the ICRC.